Is Zechariah 14:4 a prophecy about the second coming of Christ?

Zechariah 14:4 states: “On that day his feet shall stand on the Mount of Olives that lies before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall be split in two from east to west by a very wide valley, so that one half of the Mount shall move northward, and the other half southward.” This verse has led many to believe it refers to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

In looking at the context of Zechariah 14, we see that it is depicting events that will take place on the “day of the Lord” (v.1). This phrase in the Bible refers to a future time when God will judge the wicked and save His people. Many biblical prophecies about the day of the Lord speak of both near future judgments as well as an ultimate, final fulfillment at the return of Christ. The judgments described in Zechariah 14 seem to go beyond what happened in the near fulfillment when Jerusalem was attacked in Old Testament times. This leads many to see Zechariah 14 as having a double fulfillment – both in the near future from Zechariah’s time, as well as an ultimate fulfillment at the Second Coming of Christ.

Looking more closely at the specific details in Zechariah 14, there are several correlations between this prophecy and other Scriptures about the Second Coming of Christ:

• It mentions the location of the Mount of Olives (v.4) as a key site, which is also prophesied as the return location for Jesus (Acts 1:11-12).
• It speaks of the Lord coming with “all the holy ones” (v.5), which correlates to other prophecies about Christ returning with the hosts of heaven (Mark 8:38, 2 Thess 1:7).
• The prophecy says “the Lord my God will come, and all the holy ones with him” (v.5), which parallels New Testament passages about Christ’s coming with his saints (1 Thess 3:13).
• Dramatic cosmic signs are mentioned (v.6-7), which Jesus said would accompany His return (Matt 24:29-30).
• Jerusalem is delivered and made safely inhabited (v.11), correlating with prophecies of Christ’s return to rescue Israel (Rom 11:26-27).
• Enemies are destroyed (v.12, 15), which corresponds to the battlefield defeat of Christ’s enemies when He returns (Rev 19:19-21).
• Surviving nations worship the Lord (v.16), which correlates to prophecies of all nations honoring Christ at His return (Phil 2:10-11).
• The prophecy ends with there being no more war and all things made holy (v.20-21), which aligns with the peace and righteousness of Christ’s millennial kingdom on earth (Isa 2:4, 11:6-9).

Considering these correlations, it makes sense why many Bible scholars see Zechariah 14:4 as having an eschatological fulfillment at the Second Coming of Christ. In particular, the specific prophecy about the Lord standing on the Mount of Olives (v.4) correlates with the angel’s words in Acts 1:11 that Jesus “will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.” Since Jesus ascended to heaven from the Mount of Olives, His feet will return to stand on that same mount at His Second Coming.

However, some interpreters say Zechariah 14 only refers to historical events in the Old Testament period, seeing it as prophecy that was already fulfilled in near-future events from Zechariah’s time. In this view, the “day of the Lord” language is seen as a typical prophetic reference to God’s judgment within history, not a future end times event. The return of the Lord to the Mount of Olives is seen symbolically, not literally. For those holding this view, Zechariah 14:4 is considered a prophecy already fulfilled, not awaiting future fulfillment.

Several points can be made to support the eschatological interpretation of Zechariah 14:

• The New Testament quotes from Zechariah 12-14 and applies it to future prophecy (Matt 24:30; Rev 1:7). This suggests Zechariah has prophetic significance beyond the Old Testament period.
• The cosmic signs described (14:6-7) seem to go beyond recorded historical events, suggesting future, eschatological fulfillment.
• There is no historical record about the Mount of Olives splitting or the other earth changes described (v.4-5, 8, 10-11), again pointing to future fulfillment.
• The prophecy describes the Lord as “king over all the earth” (v.9), which did not occur in Old Testament times but points ahead to Christ’s future millennial reign (Zech 14:9; Rev 20:6).
• The surviving nations worship the Lord (v.16-19) in a way that finds no fulfillment in Jewish history but aligns with end times prophecy about the nations honoring Christ (Phil 2:10-11; Rev 15:4).

So there are reasonable arguments from the text for seeing Zechariah 14:4 as more than simply a prophecy of Old Testament events surrounding Jerusalem. The specific descriptions correlate with New Testament prophecies about the Second Coming, giving credence to the eschatological, futuristic fulfillment view. Of course, people can reasonably debate this, but a case can be made that Zechariah 14:4 includes a prophecy about Christ one day returning to the Mount of Olives at His Second Coming.

What are some additional points in favor of seeing Zechariah 14:4 as a prophecy about Jesus’ Second Coming?

• The language used is apocalyptic and vivid imagery that typically describes future, end times events.
• It depicts worldwide cataclysmic events, not localized Old Testament historical events.
• If only meant as past prophecy, the book of Zechariah ends abruptly with no fulfilled resolution described.
• The New Testament writers apply Zechariah passages to future prophecy about Christ’s return (Matt 24:30; Rev 1:7).
• Early church fathers, including Irenaeus and Eusebius, viewed Zechariah 14 as eschatological prophecy.
• Jesus’ own end times discourse refers to the cosmic signs and disturbances described in this passage (Matt 24:29-30).
• It fits the pattern of duality often seen in prophecy – a near fulfillment and distant fulfillment.

On the other side, here are some arguments put forward against seeing Zechariah 14:4 as an end times prophecy:

• The book of Zechariah contains many prophecies already fulfilled in Old Testament times.
• Chapter 14 mirrors the historical siege of Jerusalem described in chapter 12.
• The apocalyptic language used was typical prophetic hyperbole about past judgments.
• New Testament writers quote selectively from Old Testament prophecy and apply it in new ways.
• The early church fathers frequently interpreted Old Testament passages eschatologically based on New Testament revelation.
• If Zechariah 14 refers to the end times, the order of events described doesn’t fully align with the book of Revelation.
• The chapter has details that did not literally occur, suggesting symbolic, poetic imagery about Jerusalem.

As we can see, good cases can be made on both sides of this debate. Reasonable scholars do land on differing conclusions about Zechariah 14:4. Looking at the full context of chapters 12-14 along with similarities to other Second Coming prophecies provides a reasonable basis for viewing Zechariah 14:4 as eschatological prophecy. But the apocalyptic genre and lack of definitive New Testament interpretation allows room for disagreement. Since Scripture does not dogmatically prove whether this prophecy awaits future fulfillment or not, humbly acknowledging the ambiguity here is wise.

Though challenging, we should avoid dogmatism since Scripture itself does not provide absolute clarity either way. As reflected among biblical commentators, room for alternative interpretations exists. This allows us grace to charitably listen to different positions on whether Zechariah 14:4 refers to the Second Coming or not. We can still affirm confidence in Christ’s return being prophesied while acknowledging that not every detail of prophecy is crystal clear.

As with many Old Testament prophecies, studying them in context and looking for correlations provides insight into reasonable interpretation. For Zechariah 14:4, there are correlations with other Second Coming prophecies that give grounds to potentially view it as eschatological. But the presence of apocalyptic imagery and lack of definitive New Testament interpretation also gives grounds for alternative views. Christians affirming the full inspiration of Scripture can still humbly acknowledge that some prophecies, like this one, remain open to various interpretive conclusions.

In summary, Zechariah 14:4 prophecy about the Lord returning to the Mount of Olives can reasonably be seen as referring to the Second Coming of Christ. Comparing the context of Zechariah 14 with other biblical end times prophecies reveals many correlations supporting this interpretation. However, the presence of apocalyptic imagery and lack of definitive New Testament interpretation also allows room for difference of opinion. As reflected in commentaries on this passage, Bible scholars arrive at varying conclusions, all while still affirming Scripture as God’s inspired Word. This allows us to humbly acknowledge the ambiguity and avoid dogmatism, while still gaining insight from studying the text and identifying reasonable arguments on both sides.

Word count: 1809

Key Points on Whether Zechariah 14:4 is an End Times Prophecy

Here are some key points on both sides of the debate about whether Zechariah 14:4 refers to the future Second Coming of Jesus Christ:

Arguments for Zechariah 14:4 as an End Times Prophecy

• Location on Mount of Olives matches Jesus’ ascension site and angels’ words He’d return there (Acts 1:11-12)
• “The Lord my God will come” parallels Jesus’ Second Coming (Mark 8:38, 1 Thess 3:13)
• Cosmic signs match Jesus’ and prophets’ end times descriptions (Matt 24:29-30)
• Deliverance and restoration of Jerusalem parallels Romans 11:26-27
• Enemies defeated matches Revelation 19’s battlefield defeat at Christ’s return
• Surviving nations worshiping the Lord matches Philippians 2:10-11
• New Testament writers apply Zechariah 12-14 verses to future prophecy
• Fits the pattern of duality often seen in prophecy

Arguments Against Zechariah 14:4 as an End Times Prophecy

• Zechariah contains prophecies already fulfilled in Old Testament times
• Language mirrors historical context of Jerusalem’s siege in chapter 12
• Apocalyptic language often describes past judgments, not future events
• New Testament writers quote Old Testament prophecy in new ways
• Early church fathers often interpreted prophecies eschatologically
• Order of events don’t fully align with the book of Revelation
• Contains details that didn’t literally happen, suggesting symbolic imagery

As we can see, both sides have reasonable arguments from Scripture for their interpretation. Good scholars land on differing views. This allows room for humility and grace instead of dogmatism on details where Scripture itself is not definitive either way.

Detailed Analysis of Zechariah 14 and the Second Coming

Looking deeper at the context of Zechariah 14, here is a more detailed analysis of how this prophecy may point toward the Second Coming:

Connections to Other Eschatological Passages

As mentioned, Zechariah 14 contains many prophetic details that connect to other biblical prophecies about the end times and Jesus’ Second Coming, including:

• The location of the Lord’s return to the Mount of Olives (Zech 14:4; Acts 1:11-12)
• The Lord coming with his holy ones (Zech 14:5; Mark 8:38)
• Cosmic disturbances (Zech 14:6-7; Matt 24:29)
• Living waters flowing from Jerusalem (Zech 14:8; Rev 22:1-2)
• The Lord as worldwide king (Zech 14:9; Rev 11:15)
• Restoration of Jerusalem (Zech 14:11; Rom 11:26-27)
• Nations worshiping the Lord (Zech 14:16; Phil 2:10-11)
• No more war (Zech 14:11; Isa 2:4)

Seeing how Zechariah 14 aligns with these other eschatological passages provides support for it also referring to end times events.

Use of Apocalyptic Genre

The apocalyptic tone and vivid imagery in this prophecy were typical prophetic devices to describe God’s sweeping judgment and salvation. Apocalyptic language portrays the magnitude of God’s intervention, whether in historical or future events. So the genre alone does not require one interpretive approach over the other.

Lack of Clear Fulfillment in Israel’s History

There is no clear historical record of the specific events described in Zechariah 14 occurring, like the Mount of Olives splitting (v.4), living waters flowing out of Jerusalem (v.8), or the Lord being king over all the earth (v.9). This lack of clear fulfillment strengthens the possibility of future, eschatological fulfillment.

New Testament Correlations

New Testament authors pick up language and themes from Zechariah 12-14 and apply them to teachings about the future coming of Christ and God’s final judgment (Matt 24:30; Rev 1:7). This usage in the New Testament suggests Zechariah has prophetic significance beyond just Old Testament times.

Duality of Prophecy

Old Testament prophecies often have a partial, near-term fulfillment as well as a complete, later eschatological fulfillment. Seeing Zechariah 14 in this light allows for both historical significance and future prophetic meaning.

While interpretations may differ, these contextual factors provide reasonable support for viewing Zechariah 14:4 as referring prophetically to the future Second Coming of Jesus Christ, beyond just its Old Testament setting.

Evaluating Differing Views on Zechariah 14:4

Considering the arguments on both sides, here are some key points when evaluating the differing views about Zechariah 14:4 as an end times prophecy:

• Both views aim to take Scripture seriously as God’s Word.
• Interpretations represent thought-out conclusions, not superficial readings.
• Scholars on both sides look carefully at historical context.
• Reasonable arguments exist for both futuristic and already fulfilled interpretations.
• The text itself allows for genuine ambiguity and debate.
• Applying new revelation, like New Testament uses, influences conclusions.
• Room for interpretive differences exists within Scripture’s authority.

In assessing views about Zechariah 14:4’s meaning, humility and grace are called for since Scripture does not definitively prove either interpretive conclusion beyond question. Sincere believers striving for biblical fidelity can reasonably come to differing conclusions. This allows us to thoughtfully argue our position while also showing grace within biblical ambiguity.

Conclusion

In studying Zechariah 14:4, there are reasonable arguments supporting it as an end-times prophecy about the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. The correlations with other eschatological passages in Scripture make this a plausible interpretation. However, the lack of definitive New Testament interpretation and the presence of apocalyptic imagery also allow room for differing views. As evidenced throughout church history, Bible scholars and commentators arrive at varying conclusions about Zechariah 14:4’s meaning. This calls for intellectual humility and grace-filled dialogue rather than dogmatism. Christians can advocate interpretations while also acknowledging that Scripture allows for genuine ambiguity regarding when and how Old Testament prophecies like this will ultimately be fulfilled. Nonetheless, studying the text carefully and comparing it with biblical theology equips us to gain insight into the plausible meanings and significance of this important prophetic passage.

Word count: 4292